With or Without AI: Ethical Use of Generative AI in Research and Scholarly Publishing

Recent developments in generative artificial intelligence have also been influencing the field of research. As GenAI tools can be beneficial in various aspects of academic work, it is crucial to ensure their use aligns with ethical standards and research integrity.

To support this, we have compiled useful guidelines and policies on the use of generative AI tools in research and scholarly publishing, which we hope will be valuable for PSR authors and the research community.

1. Artificial Intelligence Policy | SAGE Publications Inc

The key resource for PSR authors. SAGE’s policy distinguishes, among other things, between assistive AI tools, which do not require disclosure, and generative AI tools, which must be disclosed when used by authors or reviewers.

2. Use of generative artificial intelligence in application preparation and assessment – UKRI

This document outlines UKRI’s policy on the use of generative AI in funding applications and assessments.

3. AI in research – UK Research Integrity Office (ukrio.org)

A guidance document on the use of GenAI in education and research, addressing the rapid emergence of these tools and the need for regulatory frameworks in most countries.

4. Insights 2024: Attitudes To AI Full Report.pdf (Taylor&Francis)

A comprehensive report by Elsevier examines researchers’ and clinicians’ perspectives on generative artificial intelligence.

5. Guidance for generative AI in education and research | UNESCO

A comprehensive guidance document on the use of generative AI in education and research. It proposes a human-centred approach to regulating and using GenAI tools in educational and research settings.

gathered by Eliza Kania

Leave a Reply